2011Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

The Invisible Hand as Knowledge

Warren J. Samuels, Marianne Johnson, William H. Perry

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction The meaningfulness of the concept of the invisible hand depends on the status of the invisible hand as knowledge. Essay 6 examined the linguistic status of the concept. This essay is concerned with the concept’s ontological and epistemological status. Considerably more attention has been given in the literature to linguistic issues than to ontological and epistemological issues. The results of this discussion were essentially negative. The ontological and epistemological issues, rarely directly discussed in the literature, are actually fairly straightforward. Once again, however, the results of the discussion are negative. Ontology and the Status of the Invisible Hand Metaphysics has to do with absolutes and ultimates. One branch of metaphysics, cosmology , deals with the origin and structure of the world, or universe, broadly defined. Closely related is ontology , which has to do with the ultimate nature of being, existence (both per se and nature), and/or reality, including first principles. Theology is the study of the nature of God and the relations of God to the universe and to humankind, as well as the study of religious doctrine. Ethics is the study of standards of conduct and of moral judgment, and comprises the domain of normative propositions (dealing with goodness, propriety, and ought). Epistemology is the theory of knowledge, which some scholars place within metaphysics. Cosmology, ontology, epistemology, theology, and ethics have in common the subject matter of existence whose ultimate content, nature, or first principles generally cannot be directly dealt with and/or experienced, and whose study is substantially conjectural. Accordingly, propositions that arguably form the content of these fields are matters of assertion. They provide no basis for study that permits either conclusive confirmation or disconfirmation of their existence or characteristics, nor do they have conclusive metaprinciples enabling comparisons and/or choice of competing principles.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction The meaningfulness of the concept of the invisible hand depends on the status of the invisible hand as knowledge. Essay 6 examined the linguistic status of the concept. This essay is concerned with the concept’s ontological and epistemological status. Considerably more attention has been given in the literature to linguistic issues than to ontological and epistemological issues. The results of this discussion were essentially negative. The ontological and epistemological issues, rarely directly discussed in the literature, are actually fairly straightforward. Once again, however, the results of the discussion are negative. Ontology and the Status of the Invisible Hand Metaphysics has to do with absolutes and ultimates. One branch of metaphysics, cosmology , deals with the origin and structure of the world, or universe, broadly defined. Closely related is ontology , which has to do with the ultimate nature of being, existence (both per se and nature), and/or reality, including first principles. Theology is the study of the nature of God and the relations of God to the universe and to humankind, as well as the study of religious doctrine. Ethics is the study of standards of conduct and of moral judgment, and comprises the domain of normative propositions (dealing with goodness, propriety, and ought). Epistemology is the theory of knowledge, which some scholars place within metaphysics. Cosmology, ontology, epistemology, theology, and ethics have in common the subject matter of existence whose ultimate content, nature, or first principles generally cannot be directly dealt with and/or experienced, and whose study is substantially conjectural. Accordingly, propositions that arguably form the content of these fields are matters of assertion. They provide no basis for study that permits either conclusive confirmation or disconfirmation of their existence or characteristics, nor do they have conclusive metaprinciples enabling comparisons and/or choice of competing principles.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction The meaningfulness of the concept of the invisible hand depends on the status of the invisible hand as knowledge. Essay 6 examined the linguistic status of the concept. This essay is concerned with the concept’s ontological and epistemological status. Considerably more attention has been given in the literature to linguistic issues than to ontological and epistemological issues. The results of this discussion were essentially negative. The ontological and epistemological issues, rarely directly discussed in the literature, are actually fairly straightforward. Once again, however, the results of the discussion are negative. Ontology and the Status of the Invisible Hand Metaphysics has to do with absolutes and ultimates. One branch of metaphysics, cosmology , deals with the origin and structure of the world, or universe, broadly defined. Closely related is ontology , which has to do with the ultimate nature of being, existence (both per se and nature), and/or reality, including first principles. Theology is the study of the nature of God and the relations of God to the universe and to humankind, as well as the study of religious doctrine. Ethics is the study of standards of conduct and of moral judgment, and comprises the domain of normative propositions (dealing with goodness, propriety, and ought). Epistemology is the theory of knowledge, which some scholars place within metaphysics. Cosmology, ontology, epistemology, theology, and ethics have in common the subject matter of existence whose ultimate content, nature, or first principles generally cannot be directly dealt with and/or experienced, and whose study is substantially conjectural. Accordingly, propositions that arguably form the content of these fields are matters of assertion. They provide no basis for study that permits either conclusive confirmation or disconfirmation of their existence or characteristics, nor do they have conclusive metaprinciples enabling comparisons and/or choice of competing principles.

Key concepts: Epistemology, Sociology, Psychology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Invisible Hand as Knowledge — Research Paper | ScholarLens