2002•Eprints@CMFRI Open Access Institutional Repository (Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute)Open access

Drift gill net fishery for large pelagics at Cochin - A case study on by-catch of pelagic sharks

A A Jayaprakash, N G K Pillai, M N K Elayathu

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

In India, the elasmobranchs contributed on an average 60,8(X) t during 1986 to 1999 \nforming 2.7% of the total marine fish landings. The production varied from 50,000t \nin 1990 to a highest of 75,(X)0 t in 1998. The sharks dominated forming 62.4%, \nfollowed by rays (33.5%) and skates the rest. The west coast accounted for 55.5% \nand east coast 44.5%. The highest contribution of 30.2% was from Gujarat followed \nby Tamilnadu (26.2%). The drift gillnets, sharing 48.5% of the production, was the \nmajor gear, followed by trawls (31.5%) and hooks and line (6.1%). Since the drift \ngillnets (DGN), apart from the scombroids, exploit a variety of larger pelagics, a \ncase study of the shark fishery by the gear at Kochi was made based on the data from \n1979 to 1999 and the results are presented here

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In India, the elasmobranchs contributed on an average 60,8(X) t during 1986 to 1999 \nforming 2.7% of the total marine fish landings. The production varied from 50,000t \nin 1990 to a highest of 75,(X)0 t in 1998. The sharks dominated forming 62.4%, \nfollowed by rays (33.5%) and skates the rest. The west coast accounted for 55.5% \nand east coast 44.5%. The highest contribution of 30.2% was from Gujarat followed \nby Tamilnadu (26.2%). The drift gillnets, sharing 48.5% of the production, was the \nmajor gear, followed by trawls (31.5%) and hooks and line (6.1%). Since the drift \ngillnets (DGN), apart from the scombroids, exploit a variety of larger pelagics, a \ncase study of the shark fishery by the gear at Kochi was made based on the data from \n1979 to 1999 and the results are presented here

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In India, the elasmobranchs contributed on an average 60,8(X) t during 1986 to 1999 \nforming 2.7% of the total marine fish landings. The production varied from 50,000t \nin 1990 to a highest of 75,(X)0 t in 1998. The sharks dominated forming 62.4%, \nfollowed by rays (33.5%) and skates the rest. The west coast accounted for 55.5% \nand east coast 44.5%. The highest contribution of 30.2% was from Gujarat followed \nby Tamilnadu (26.2%). The drift gillnets, sharing 48.5% of the production, was the \nmajor gear, followed by trawls (31.5%) and hooks and line (6.1%). Since the drift \ngillnets (DGN), apart from the scombroids, exploit a variety of larger pelagics, a \ncase study of the shark fishery by the gear at Kochi was made based on the data from \n1979 to 1999 and the results are presented here

Key concepts: Pelagic zone, Fishery, West coast, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Bycatch, Oceanography, Geography, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Drift gill net fishery for large pelagics at Cochin - A case study on by-catch of pelagic sharks — Research Paper | ScholarLens