2004Unpublished venueRequires access

A causal logic of logic programming

Alexander Bochman

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

The causal logic from (Bochman 2003b) is shown to provide a natural logical basis for logic programming. More exactly, it is argued that any logic program can be seen as a causal theory satisfying the Negation As Default principle (alias Closed World Assumption). Moreover, unlike well-known translations of logic programs to other nonmonotonic formalisms, the established correspondence between logic programs and causal theories is bidirectional in the sense that, for an appropriate causal logic, any causal theory is reducible to a logic program. The correspondence is shown to hold for logic programs of a most general kind involving disjunctions and default negations in heads of the rules. It is shown also to be adequate for a broad range of logic programming semantics, including stable, supported and partial stable models. The results strongly suggest that the causal logic can serve as a (long missing) logic of logic programming.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The causal logic from (Bochman 2003b) is shown to provide a natural logical basis for logic programming. More exactly, it is argued that any logic program can be seen as a causal theory satisfying the Negation As Default principle (alias Closed World Assumption). Moreover, unlike well-known translations of logic programs to other nonmonotonic formalisms, the established correspondence between logic programs and causal theories is bidirectional in the sense that, for an appropriate causal logic, any causal theory is reducible to a logic program. The correspondence is shown to hold for logic programs of a most general kind involving disjunctions and default negations in heads of the rules. It is shown also to be adequate for a broad range of logic programming semantics, including stable, supported and partial stable models. The results strongly suggest that the causal logic can serve as a (long missing) logic of logic programming.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The causal logic from (Bochman 2003b) is shown to provide a natural logical basis for logic programming. More exactly, it is argued that any logic program can be seen as a causal theory satisfying the Negation As Default principle (alias Closed World Assumption). Moreover, unlike well-known translations of logic programs to other nonmonotonic formalisms, the established correspondence between logic programs and causal theories is bidirectional in the sense that, for an appropriate causal logic, any causal theory is reducible to a logic program. The correspondence is shown to hold for logic programs of a most general kind involving disjunctions and default negations in heads of the rules. It is shown also to be adequate for a broad range of logic programming semantics, including stable, supported and partial stable models. The results strongly suggest that the causal logic can serve as a (long missing) logic of logic programming.

Key concepts: Autoepistemic logic, Philosophy of logic, Computational logic, Multimodal logic, Logic programming, Horn clause, Higher-order logic, Dynamic logic (digital electronics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A causal logic of logic programming — Research Paper | ScholarLens