2012•ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University)Requires access

About the condition of the Aborigines of Australia

Chris Cunneen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

[Extract] Lex Wotton has been silenced by law. It is not his own Aboriginal law, but the law of a neo-colonial society that imposes itself on a marginalised people. Anglo-Australian law and policy has always sought to silence Indigenous peoples in Australia. The doctrine of terra nullius was the original silencing of the colonised. Indigenous peoples had no right to speak of their law or society because they did not exist as peoples with culture or organised social life. Despite more recent recognition of native title to land, the courts continue to uphold that Aboriginal peoples 'have no legislative, executive or judicical organs by which sovereignty might be organised' (Coe v Commonwealth (1979) 24 ALR 118 at 129). Without sovereignty, Indigenous peoples remain neither within the nation-state with recognised rights, nor fully outside the colonial society as separate independent people. They are suspended on the margins without a right to speak. 'What assertion of sovereignty by the British Crown necessarily entailed was that there could be thereafter no parallel law-making system in the territory over which it asserted sovereignty'. (Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria(2002) 194 ALR 538 at 552). Like Lex himself, the laws of Aboriginal peoples in Australia were struck mute.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

[Extract] Lex Wotton has been silenced by law. It is not his own Aboriginal law, but the law of a neo-colonial society that imposes itself on a marginalised people. Anglo-Australian law and policy has always sought to silence Indigenous peoples in Australia. The doctrine of terra nullius was the original silencing of the colonised. Indigenous peoples had no right to speak of their law or society because they did not exist as peoples with culture or organised social life. Despite more recent recognition of native title to land, the courts continue to uphold that Aboriginal peoples 'have no legislative, executive or judicical organs by which sovereignty might be organised' (Coe v Commonwealth (1979) 24 ALR 118 at 129). Without sovereignty, Indigenous peoples remain neither within the nation-state with recognised rights, nor fully outside the colonial society as separate independent people. They are suspended on the margins without a right to speak. 'What assertion of sovereignty by the British Crown necessarily entailed was that there could be thereafter no parallel law-making system in the territory over which it asserted sovereignty'. (Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria(2002) 194 ALR 538 at 552). Like Lex himself, the laws of Aboriginal peoples in Australia were struck mute.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

[Extract] Lex Wotton has been silenced by law. It is not his own Aboriginal law, but the law of a neo-colonial society that imposes itself on a marginalised people. Anglo-Australian law and policy has always sought to silence Indigenous peoples in Australia. The doctrine of terra nullius was the original silencing of the colonised. Indigenous peoples had no right to speak of their law or society because they did not exist as peoples with culture or organised social life. Despite more recent recognition of native title to land, the courts continue to uphold that Aboriginal peoples 'have no legislative, executive or judicical organs by which sovereignty might be organised' (Coe v Commonwealth (1979) 24 ALR 118 at 129). Without sovereignty, Indigenous peoples remain neither within the nation-state with recognised rights, nor fully outside the colonial society as separate independent people. They are suspended on the margins without a right to speak. 'What assertion of sovereignty by the British Crown necessarily entailed was that there could be thereafter no parallel law-making system in the territory over which it asserted sovereignty'. (Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria(2002) 194 ALR 538 at 552). Like Lex himself, the laws of Aboriginal peoples in Australia were struck mute.

Key concepts: Indigenous, Sovereignty, Law, Colonialism, Political science, Commonwealth, Indigenous rights, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
About the condition of the Aborigines of Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens