2001•Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University)Open access

Construction value management revisited: the designer's role

Derek S. Thomson, Simon A. Austin

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Value management is well established in construction. The method provides a\nstructured, documentable consideration of project stakeholders to ensure that projects\nare required, framed to satisfy values and sufficiently supported by all stakeholders to\nensure successful completion. A variety of construction-specific value management\nmethods exist and many UK design management contractors offer the practice to\nclients as a structured method of considering the role of each project in adding value\nto clients’ business activities.\nValue management in construction has grown from the manufacturing sector, but\nhistorical review suggests it was extrapolated verbatim, with limited revision for\nconstruction application. The soundness of this foundation is examined. The paper\nreviews the extent to which designers are currently provided with mechanisms to\nconsider stakeholder values during the project stages when most design output is\nproduced. Integral Value Engineering is proposed to continuously relate ongoing\ndesign activity to the project values current at the time of each design task’s\ncompletion.\nThe paper describes a toolbox of value-adding tools that provide project designers\nwith methods of structuring design activity to relate technical design solutions to\nstakeholder values. Development of the toolbox as a web-based resource is reviewed,\nand its supporting role confirmed by validation exercises. The paper concludes by\nestablishing the need for all designers in the supply chain to be provided with methods\nof structuring their problem solving processes to address value delivery, and the\nsuitability of the value-adding toolbox to them. Future work must develop means of\nactively maintaining a shared understanding of values throughout project progression,\nproviding a framework and objective for ongoing design activity.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Value management is well established in construction. The method provides a\nstructured, documentable consideration of project stakeholders to ensure that projects\nare required, framed to satisfy values and sufficiently supported by all stakeholders to\nensure successful completion. A variety of construction-specific value management\nmethods exist and many UK design management contractors offer the practice to\nclients as a structured method of considering the role of each project in adding value\nto clients’ business activities.\nValue management in construction has grown from the manufacturing sector, but\nhistorical review suggests it was extrapolated verbatim, with limited revision for\nconstruction application. The soundness of this foundation is examined. The paper\nreviews the extent to which designers are currently provided with mechanisms to\nconsider stakeholder values during the project stages when most design output is\nproduced. Integral Value Engineering is proposed to continuously relate ongoing\ndesign activity to the project values current at the time of each design task’s\ncompletion.\nThe paper describes a toolbox of value-adding tools that provide project designers\nwith methods of structuring design activity to relate technical design solutions to\nstakeholder values. Development of the toolbox as a web-based resource is reviewed,\nand its supporting role confirmed by validation exercises. The paper concludes by\nestablishing the need for all designers in the supply chain to be provided with methods\nof structuring their problem solving processes to address value delivery, and the\nsuitability of the value-adding toolbox to them. Future work must develop means of\nactively maintaining a shared understanding of values throughout project progression,\nproviding a framework and objective for ongoing design activity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Value management is well established in construction. The method provides a\nstructured, documentable consideration of project stakeholders to ensure that projects\nare required, framed to satisfy values and sufficiently supported by all stakeholders to\nensure successful completion. A variety of construction-specific value management\nmethods exist and many UK design management contractors offer the practice to\nclients as a structured method of considering the role of each project in adding value\nto clients’ business activities.\nValue management in construction has grown from the manufacturing sector, but\nhistorical review suggests it was extrapolated verbatim, with limited revision for\nconstruction application. The soundness of this foundation is examined. The paper\nreviews the extent to which designers are currently provided with mechanisms to\nconsider stakeholder values during the project stages when most design output is\nproduced. Integral Value Engineering is proposed to continuously relate ongoing\ndesign activity to the project values current at the time of each design task’s\ncompletion.\nThe paper describes a toolbox of value-adding tools that provide project designers\nwith methods of structuring design activity to relate technical design solutions to\nstakeholder values. Development of the toolbox as a web-based resource is reviewed,\nand its supporting role confirmed by validation exercises. The paper concludes by\nestablishing the need for all designers in the supply chain to be provided with methods\nof structuring their problem solving processes to address value delivery, and the\nsuitability of the value-adding toolbox to them. Future work must develop means of\nactively maintaining a shared understanding of values throughout project progression,\nproviding a framework and objective for ongoing design activity.

Key concepts: Structuring, Toolbox, Stakeholder, Process management, Variety (cybernetics), Computer science, Project management, Value (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Construction value management revisited: the designer's role — Research Paper | ScholarLens