2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Focus Interpretation in Thetic Statements: Alternative Semantics and OT Pragmatics

Kjell Johan Sæbø

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Broad focus (or informationalintegration or nonautonomy) is lexically and contextually constrained, but these constraints are not well understood. On a standard theory of focus interpretation, the presupposition of a broad focus is verified whenever those of two narrow foci are. I argue that to account for cases where two narrow foci are preferred, it is necessary to assume that broad focus competes with two narrow foci and implicates the opposite of what they presuppose. Central constraints on thetic statements are thus accounted for in an OT enriched Alternative Semantics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Broad focus (or informationalintegration or nonautonomy) is lexically and contextually constrained, but these constraints are not well understood. On a standard theory of focus interpretation, the presupposition of a broad focus is verified whenever those of two narrow foci are. I argue that to account for cases where two narrow foci are preferred, it is necessary to assume that broad focus competes with two narrow foci and implicates the opposite of what they presuppose. Central constraints on thetic statements are thus accounted for in an OT enriched Alternative Semantics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Broad focus (or informationalintegration or nonautonomy) is lexically and contextually constrained, but these constraints are not well understood. On a standard theory of focus interpretation, the presupposition of a broad focus is verified whenever those of two narrow foci are. I argue that to account for cases where two narrow foci are preferred, it is necessary to assume that broad focus competes with two narrow foci and implicates the opposite of what they presuppose. Central constraints on thetic statements are thus accounted for in an OT enriched Alternative Semantics.

Key concepts: Presupposition, Focus (optics), Semantics (computer science), Interpretation (philosophy), Pragmatics, Epistemology, Linguistics, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Focus Interpretation in Thetic Statements: Alternative Semantics and OT Pragmatics — Research Paper | ScholarLens